Beats solo 3 reviews: Beats Solo3 2019 Wireless Review

Beats Solo3 Wireless review: Beats popular on-ear wireless headphone gains best-in-class battery life

Beats’ Solo3 Wireless on-ear
Bluetooth
headphone ($300/£250/AU$400) looks nearly identical to the Beats Solo 2 Wireless because — on the outside at least — Beats hasn’t updated its design. The big change is on the inside: The Solo3 uses
Apple
‘s new W1 custom Bluetooth chip, which improves battery life drastically and makes pairing the headphone with Apple devices dead simple.

The headphone works just fine with Android and other Bluetooth-enabled devices and the battery life rating is the same for
iOS
and Android — a whopping 40 hours. That’s a huge jump over the 12 hours that the
Beats Solo2 Wireless
is rated at and this has the best battery life of any Bluetooth headphone I’ve tested so far (I used it for a week without recharging). It also features Beats’ Fast Fuel feature, which gives you 3 hours of battery life from a 5-minute charge.

Enlarge Image

The Solo3 Wireless in silver.

Sarah Tew/CNET

However, unlike the new BeatsX, which uses a Lightning cable for charging, this model sticks with a Micro-USB charging cable.

On the plus side, my wireless connection using the headphone was rock-solid and the W1 chip makes it easy to switch between Apple devices you’ve paired the
headphones
to. Overall, the headphone performs very well, and I’ve always liked its compact size and how it folds up to fit into a relatively small carrying case (yes, that carrying case is included).

For better or worse, Beats hasn’t upgraded the sound. The Solo3 Wireless sounds very good for an on-ear Bluetooth headphone and will appeal to bass lovers who prefer a sound profile that accentuates the bass but manages to avoid being too boomy. However, it doesn’t sound quite as clean as Beats’ more balanced Studio Wireless over-ear model, which has come down in price and I find more comfortable (the
Beats Solo3 Wireless
offers a very snug fit — the headphones do stay securely on your head, even while running — they end up pressing down on your ears somewhat firmly).

This is a headphone that’s designed to be worn outdoors, and the extra bass did come in handy when I was walking the streets of New York and was competing with a lot of ambient noise, including the subway when I went underground. The headphones passively seal out a good amount of sound, but some ambient noise does leak in and the extra bass doesn’t sound as accentuated outside (you really hear it in quiet rooms, however) and the headphones comes across as a little more balanced.

As with all stereo Bluetooth headphones, this model has a built-in microphone for making calls, and call quality was decent, though the step-up Studio Wireless has an advantage in this department. Some headphones in this price range, including the Studio Wireless, feature improved communications performance and noise-canceling features that muffle ambient noise so callers can hear you better. This Beats is not in that class.

Enlarge Image

The controls for answering and ending calls, volume and skipping tracks forward and back are on the earcups.

Sarah Tew/CNET

Competing models include Bose’s SoundLink Wireless On-ear, Sennheiser’s Momentum 2 On-ear Wireless and Plantronic’s Backbeat Sense. Both the
BackBeat Sense
and the Bose are more comfortable headphones, applying a little less pressure to your ears, and the Plantronics is clearly the best value at about $125.

In its favor, the Solo3 Wireless has that iconic Beats design, and the headphone does come in several attractive finishes. (I personally like the matte black and the silver featured in our photos.)

Ultimately, Beats’ value proposition is that it’s taken the same headphone that so many people know and love and improved its battery life dramatically and made it really easy for Apple users to connect to their
phones
and other Apple devices.

That’s fine, but it would have been nice if Beats had brought the price down at the same time, considering the headphone’s design and sound hasn’t been upgraded. As it stands, this headphone is in the realm of what superior over-ear noise-canceling wireless headphones such as the Bose Quiet Comfort 25 cost. And while the Beats’ own Studio Wireless delivers only about 12 hours of battery life and is a bigger headphone, it costs around $50 less ($250) after starting out at $379.

The long and short of it is that the Beats Solo3 Wireless is a likable on-ear wireless headphone with great battery life, but $300 is a lot to pay for it.

Beats Solo3 Review | Tested by GearLab

Decent performance that doesn’t quite match the expectations set by the list price

$129 at Amazon

Price:  $300 List

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Manufacturer:  
Beats by Dre

By Max Mutter and Steven Tata  ⋅  Jan 18, 2022

59

OVERALL
SCORE

RANKED
#8 of 9

  • Sound Quality – 30%
    7.0

  • Noise Isolation – 25%
    4.0

  • Comfort – 25%
    5.0

  • User Friendliness – 10%
    6. 0

  • Portability – 10%
    9.0

RELATED: Best Wireless Headphones of 2023

Our Verdict

While the Beats Solo3 are good headphones, they don’t quite live up to the high-end pedigree suggested by both their price and their advertising. The sound quality is good but not exceptional, they do not offer active noise cancellation, and they’re not the most comfortable headphones we’ve tested. They are exceptionally light at just 7.5 ounces, are available in many different colors and have a nice, minimalistic design. If you find those features important in your favorite wireless headphones, then these are a worthwhile buy.

REASONS TO BUY

Lightweight

Good sound

REASONS TO AVOID

Expensive

Especially considering their relative performance

Editor’s Note: This review includes new information on our favorite products and those we would buy. It was updated on January 18, 2021.

Compare to Similar Products

(change comparison)

 

This Product
Beats Solo3

Bose Noise Cancelling 700

Sony WH-1000XM4

Bose QuietComfort 35 II

Soundcore Life Q20

Awards          
Price $300 List
$129.00 at Amazon
$400 List
$379.00 at Amazon
$350 List
$347.99 at Amazon
$350 List
$374.00 at Amazon
$60 List
$59.00 at Amazon
Overall Score 
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Lightweight, good sound Excellent sound quality, field-leading noise cancellation, comfortable Superb active noise cancellation and overall sound quality, multipoint Bluetooth pairing, auto-pause, relatively comfortable for most people Great sound quality, good noise cancellation, comfortable, built-in Google Assistant Inexpensive, powerful bass, effective active noise cancellation, comfortable
Cons Expensive, especially considering their relative performance Expensive Expensive Expensive Lacks some brightness in mid and vocal ranges, headband may be to large for smaller heads
Bottom Line Decent performance that doesn’t quite match the expectations set by the list price Pillowy comfort and one of the best personal listening experiences we’ve enjoyed from any device Top-notch in terms of both noise cancellation and sound quality, it’s hard to find a better listening experience Top of the line headphones that offer nearly everything you could want Impressively inexpensive given the sound quality, active noise-canceling performance, and comfort
Rating Categories Beats Solo3 Bose Noise Cancelli. .. Sony WH-1000XM4 Bose QuietComfort 3… Soundcore Life Q20
Sound Quality (30%)
Noise Isolation (25%)
Comfort (25%)
User Friendliness (10%)
Portability (10%)
Specs Beats Solo3 Bose Noise Cancelli… Sony WH-1000XM4 Bose QuietComfort 3… Soundcore Life Q20
Type On-ear Over-ear Over-ear Over-ear Over-ear
Noise cancelling No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Manufacturer reported battery life (hours) 40 20 30 40 wired, 20 BT 40
Measured weight (ounces) 7. 5 9.2 8.8 10.9 9.3
Included case Padded soft case Semi-hard case Semi-hard case Semi-hard case Lined drawstring pouch
App No Yes Yes Yes No
Earcup padding cover material Leatherette Leather Foamed urethane/leatherette Synthetic protein leather Leatherette
Charging cable length (inches) N/A 42″ 7.9″ 47.2″ 40″
Microphone for voice? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Bluetooth version N/A 5.0 5.0 4.1 5.0
Onboard buttons Volume, play/pause, forward/back Volume, play/pause, forward/back, noise cancelling, voice assistant, power/bluetooth, answer/decline/mute calls Volume, change track, take/make calls Volume, play/pause, forward/back, noise cancelling Volume, multifunction, power, NC

Show full specification detailsHide full specification details

Our Analysis and Test Results

The Solo3 offers decent all-around performance, but in many areas, they fall short of similarly priced wireless headphones.

Performance Comparison

Good headphones, the Solo3 doesn’t quite live up to its price tag in our opinion.

Credit: Jenna Ammerman

Sound Quality

The Solo3 sounded better than the average pair of headphones but not exceptional in our testing. Where the Solo3 really shines is in its clarity. Everything from crowded guitar riffs to swung notes on ride cymbals sounded crisp and clear. In this capacity, these headphones were just shy of the clarity of top-scoring models.

The major downside to the Solo3 is its bass, which was very weak compared to other high-end models. This robbed some degree of depth from most music. Overall, this sound profile makes the Solo3 great for things like podcasts and acoustic music, but it makes things like bass-heavy rock or hip hop sound a bit flat compared to other high-end models.

The Solo3 sounds good, but at this price point we’d expect a bit more.

Credit: Jenna Ammerman

Noise Isolation

Noise Isolation is one area where the Solo3 really falls short of other high-end models. This is mostly because the Solo3 lacks an active noise-canceling feature, which is standard for most models in this price range. Though the headphones themselves do a decent job of muffling ambient noise, even with loud music playing, we could still hear a slightly quieter version of most of the surrounding noise. This paled compared to the almost complete sound isolation of the active noise-canceling models.

Comfort

The Solo3 was again lacking in our comfort testing. These are the only on-ear headphones that we tested, so they put some pressure on your ears by design. While this is fine for short periods after time, after using them for an hour or two, our ears were aching for a break. In contrast, over-ear models from Bose and Sony stayed on our heads all day without any complaint.

It’s somewhat personal preference, but we felt the on-ear design of the Solo3 was much less comfortable than the over-ear designs of other models.

Credit: Jenna Ammerman

User Friendliness

The Solo3 is fairly easy to use but can be a bit finicky. The headphones have a single button that functions as a play/pause button. You can also quickly press twice to skip forward a track or press three times to go back a track. To fast forward, you press twice and hold on the second press. None of these commands are particularly intuitive once you get past the play/pause functionality, so there is a slight learning curve.

One plus for Apple users is that the Solo3 uses the proprietary Apple W1 chip. This makes pairing with Apple devices even easier than usual. It also means that once you pair these headphones with one of your Apple devices, every other device logged into your Apple account will immediately recognize the headphones.

Portability

The Solo3 was the most portable headphones that we tested. These headphones weigh just 7.5 ounces and fold up into a tiny, padded carrying case. These things will certainly not weigh you down when you carry them on to your next flight.

The Beats Solo3 packs up the smallest of any of our models.

Credit: Jenna Ammerman

Should You Buy the Solo3?

Unfortunately, the Solo3 price to performance ratio isn’t particularly good. Today’s standard expects active noise cancellation in this price range. The Beats Solo3 are fairly good headphones that still fail to live up to their list price. If you’re considering spending this much on wireless headphones, there are much better options available.

What Other Wireless Headphones Should You Consider?

If your budget can stretch about $50, we’d recommend the Sony WH-1000XM4, which is the top-ranked noise cancelling headphone with superior performance in sound quality.


Max Mutter and Steven Tata


 

Beats Solo 3 Review – Wireless Headphones (Best of the Beats)

The updated Beats Solo 3 Wireless offers incredible Bluetooth range and extremely long battery life. All this became possible thanks to the new chip from Apple — W1. A new word in wireless portable sound?

Beats haven’t released anything for a long time. And it is not surprising that along with the new iPhone 7 comes new Beats. Let’s see what Apple’s resources have brought to the new generation of the most popular Beats model

Characteristics:

  • Wireless Bluetooth headphones with microphone (on-ear, closed)
  • Extras: iPhone support, foldable design, volume control, case included;
  • Functions: Active Noise Cancellation
  • Frequency response: 20 – 31000 Hz
  • Sensitivity: 110 dB
  • Impedance: 32 Ohm
  • Weight: 215 g
  • Cable: 1.3 m, detachable, single ended
  • Indication: LED
  • Profile support: A2DP, AVRCP, Hands free, Headset
  • Radius: 30 m
  • Connection
  • Connector: mini jack 3.5 mm
  • Plug shape: L-shaped
  • Operating time: 40 hours, Fast Fuel technology (5 minutes of recharging is enough for 3 hours of operation)
  • Headset functions: Answer/end call

The look and feel of the Beats Solo 3 Wireless

  • Headphones are almost no different from Solo 2. Accordingly, they look pretty good. Only now it’s invoice, not full size . But outwardly it’s the same. Apparently, Apple decided not to touch the recognizable style at all. There are a lot of flowers, as always . And yes, now you can get them in “rose gold” to perfectly match the same iPhone.
  • The model is quite comfortable. How convenient can an overhead model be. You can spend quite a lot of time in them, but not as much as in full-size ones. Still, they are on the ears. The design itself looks rather fragile, here, as before, solid plastic. He seems to be strong, but still. The ear pads are claimed to be leather, which is good. At least something to feel the “premium” of the model for its price. Headphones, of course, fold up so that you can put it in a case.

Beats Solo 3 Wireless review

Set Bits Solo 3

Together with headphones for a considerable $300 you get:

  • Case . It looks good but soft. I would like a solid one, of course
  • Audio cable . Headphones can be listened to by wire. The cable has a microphone (as in the headphones themselves) and a remote control. However, most of the functions of the remote control with Android devices do not work. But over a wireless connection, almost all the functions of the universal button function well on the “green robot”
  • USB charging cable .
  • Carbine .

Actually, the set is standard. There is a necessary minimum, but no more.

What’s new?

The main update here is chip W1 . Of course, Apple doesn’t talk too much about its specs. But we know what it does: gives a very large range, increases the “life” from a single charge and additional “goodies” in linking devices. It should be noted right away that all W1 chips are available only for Apple devices .

  • Range . He is really great. Let’s leave aside what they say at the presentations, according to real tests, it turned out that the headphones work quite tolerably 35-37 meters from the phone (some “beat themselves in the chest with a hoof”, which “there is a contact” even for 100 meters 😕 ). Compared to the standard Bluetooth 10 meters. Exceptionally high growth. While all tests appear to have been outdoors, walls likely still do a good job at breaking communications even at close range. and are tests with the previous (“rogue”) iPhone 6 . 😀 With the “seven”, it will probably be even better.
  • Operating time . And here we have a great increase. Solo 2 worked for about 12 hours. The same model produces a fantastic 40 hours from a single charge of . And in tests, this is true. It turns out that one charge is enough for for a week of average statistical use of . This is the merit of the new battery (due to which Solo 3 is heavier than its predecessor by as much as 10 grams! 😆 ) and all the same W1. Which, apparently, recognizes when the user is listening to music and when not and uses different power consumption modes. In addition, fashionable and now useful fast charging: 5 minutes is enough for 3 hours of using .
  • Device pairing . Firstly, the connection is very fast (if you have an iOS device, of course). As soon as the headphones are next to the phone, say, an invitation to connect immediately appears on it, a couple of clicks – and that’s it. And the headphones are tied not only to the phone, but also to all devices in your iCloud .

Review of Beats Solo 3 Wireless

The sound of Solo 3 is given out by classic “bist”. Lots of bass . Lots of bass. Behind him, , half of the midrange is not heard. He himself is not of very high quality. Interestingly, it is on music that already has a lot of bass (the same hip-hop, simple electronics) that there is simply too much of this “boom-boom”. In addition to the littered mids, there are strongly smoothed upper ones. This eliminates possible unpleasant distortions, such as sibilants, but the resolution of the HF here is extremely low .

However, don’t be fooled, despite the obviously weak sound that early testers have already described, the Solo 3 will sell for as little as $300. And they will sell well. Marketing Miracle.

Verdict:

A very interesting change, judging by the Beats Solo 3, begins in wireless audio. 35 meters is already great. And here we also have a very tenacious battery, recognizable style and good materials . Ah, if even the sound was at least “not bad”, there’s nothing to dream about “good”, there would be no price for them. And so, the price is – and considerable. Pay it or not? Depends on only one thing: whether you like Beats or not. If not, then you probably didn’t read it at all. And if so, then definitely worth taking.

Beats Solo 3 Gallery:

Beats Solo 3 – foldable design
Beats Solo 3 – Device Pairing

Also take a look at interesting articles on the topic:

Taste Hindi Rush Tobacco Contrabanda

Oolong with spices

Spices

Cinnamon

Tea

Banned from the production of pan masala is still India’s most desirable form of pleasure.
Chinese milk oolong with cardamom, cinnamon and cloves.

About the brand

The flavors of Contrabanda are based on selected Burley tobacco leaves and European food flavors. All tastes are carefully assembled mixes, many of which have no analogues on the market in finished form.
All tastes are divided into 6 lines: fruit and berry, sour, dessert, gastronomic, spicy, cocktail. The fortress is average, but smokes. When smoking Contrabanda tobacco, there is no sensation of irritation and sore throat.

Your score

Rate the taste

Rate the strength

Would you smoke again?

yes
Don’t know
no

Reviews (3)

Fresh

Laudatory

Devastating

4

4.5

4

4.5

4

4

4

4

4.5

Other brand flavors

1

5

In general, this is such a sour-herbaceous berry mix. In principle, both raspberries and black berries feel good here. I like that there is no strong sweetness, it will bang well with a hole, for example. Didn’t seem chemical or soapy, but a bit grassy yes

2

4.9

4

4

5

Very reminiscent of Ramen with chicken, only brighter and downright spicy. You can replace this taste with salami + ginger from Bonche. But if you want to surprise your friends, then this will come in too) I don’t really like this myself, but the taste is excellent

3

4.8

3

3

5

The best iced tea in the regular price range. I liked it more than a more watery competitor in the face of a stronger overdose. 100% hit in Lipton. It smokes for a long time, pleasantly, freshly (If not overheated). Deserved – maximum score

4

4.6

4

4

5

At my own risk I will go against all opinions below. It doesn’t look like pure cola to me, but in this case it’s even better. A direct flavor association is the marmalade haribo sour cola. Directly identical flavor and taste is the same as the aroma. A light note of herbaceousness and the line between cola and Baikal, and this is all adorned with a not vyryglazny plume sourness. And the same marmalade remains on the aftertaste. Great taste that I can recommend for a smoke. I was very surprised, like most contrabanda flavors. Definitely 5.

5

4.4

4

4

4.5

Lots of sour cranberries and sweet raspberries. Very sour taste, pleasant. Similar to the Shock series from Black Burn.

6

4.3

3

3

4.3

Sweet Caramel Popcorn.
Lost in mixes.
Slightly weak.
Nothing more to write…

7

4.2

3

3

4

There is more emphasis on spices than oolong. The tea is not as bright as that of the dark or Spectrum, it is in the background and dim. Spices are soft, do not hit the throat
The mix is ​​absolutely unsweetened and it didn’t work for me solo (probably, you have to love spices very much), but the pack scattered with a bang into mixes with different fruits
Sufficiently specific taste, for an amateur

8

4. 1

2

2

4

Better than analogue from the Spectrum. But still, currants strongly predominate, an energy drink with a light background.

9

4

Charlotte from Severny has disappeared somewhere in the nearest stores, and the rest of the analogues are not up to par. Here DOLLAR BILL is a good alternative for me, but the taste of baking is missing

10

3.9

3

3

3

Unusual taste, haven’t tried similar ones, but didn’t go in – too cloying, a lot of milky aftertaste.

11

3.9

1

1

3.9

Mango prevails. Tarragon on the exhale and in the aftertaste. The combination is strange. And what is strange – the first taste of Contrabanda, which hits the throat

12

3.8

2

2

4.2

Nice mix. Smoked often in summer

13

3.6

6

6

4

Taste hit is not 100%, but smokes very cool like the taste of very sour to viscous rhubarb.